I think individual creators or publishers tend to overestimate the value of their specific content in the grand scheme of [AI training]. […]
We pay for content when it’s valuable to people. We’re just not going to pay for content when it’s not valuable to people. I think that you’ll probably see a similar dynamic with AI, which my guess is that there are going to be certain partnerships that get made when content is really important and valuable. I’d guess that there are probably a lot of people who have a concern about the feel of it, like you’re saying. But then, when push comes to shove, if they demanded that we don’t use their content, then we just wouldn’t use their content. It’s not like that’s going to change the outcome of this stuff that much.
Recent articles
- Qwen3-4B-Thinking: "This is art - pelicans don't ride bikes!" - 10th August 2025
- My Lethal Trifecta talk at the Bay Area AI Security Meetup - 9th August 2025
- The surprise deprecation of GPT-4o for ChatGPT consumers - 8th August 2025